Contract _ Terms of Business, Battle of the Forms and Letters of Intent. The buyer (a company that made control systems for vehicles) placed orders with the seller (a company that supplied pedal sensors). Both parties traded on their standard terms of business, the key difference between the two being, as it is usual to expect, the extent of the liability, if something went wrong under the contract. The buyer's conditions sought to impose unlimited liability on the seller for certain breaches, while the seller's conditions purported to exclude any liability for consequential loss or damage and restricted its business liability to repair.
For a Price Quotation.Hence the document's name, it meaning is expressed by it's name. Hence an appropriate response, for a vendor or supplier, is issuing a a price quote.So you see, the response requested is indicated in the very form and name of the document itself. The Letter of Intent has no established place in International trade law. Where they are used _ rarely _ is in some small niche internal markets and trades. The RFQ, Request for Quotation, a standard protocol in the business world, is what most brokers actually want when they err in using an LOI.